top of page
BOARD ALCHEMY
The Family Office - The Living Governance Network
Multi-Layer Ecosystem Governance for Single and Multi-Family Offices at the $84 Trillion Generational Transfer Inflection.
70% of family offices lose wealth by the second generation. Not from investment underperformance — from governance dysfunction that erodes both capital and family unity. We make the invisible network visible, measurable, and governable.
$84T Generational transfer underway 2026–2045
70% Lose wealth by Generation Two
60–80% CIO turnover within 36 months
55% Lack any formal succession plan
The Structural Reality — Why Family Offices Fail at the Network Level
Every family office leader has seen the org chart: neat boxes, clean reporting lines, documented authority. Yet every experienced family office stakeholder knows a defining truth: the org chart is fiction. It documents the governance structure leadership wishes existed, not the governance network that actually operates.
The family office is not an organisational chart. It is a living network — a complex web of relationships, influence patterns, information flows, trust dynamics, and power structures that determine whether governance actually functions or merely appears functional. The patriarch who formally delegates authority actually makes decisions through phone calls with an informal advisor who appears nowhere on the org chart.
The CIO who formally reports to the investment committee receives direction through side conversations that circumvent formal channels. The next-generation leader who sits on the board as 'observer' influences decisions through coalitions that formal structure neither recognises nor enables.
These are not governance failures. They are governance realities. The network is the governance.
Governance effectiveness is determined not by the formal structures you have documented, but by the actual network through which decisions flow, relationships form, trust builds or erodes, and coordination either succeeds or fails.
The Three-Layer Actor-Network Every Family Office Operates
Family offices are not two-party relationships. They operate as three-layer actor-networks requiring systematic coordination across all three simultaneously:
The Misdiagnosis — Why Traditional Interventions Fail
When governance deteriorates, family offices default to adjusting formal structure: updating board composition, revising decision rights documents, adding oversight processes, and engaging a new advisor. These are mechanical solutions for a network problem.
Traditional advisors each optimise a single layer: wealth managers focus on portfolio performance; family business consultants address family dynamics; PE advisors provide GP access; management consultants deliver process solutions. None addresses the network coordination infrastructure that determines whether families preserve both wealth and unity across generations.
The Converging Six Forces — Why This Moment Is Different
The family office governance challenge has always existed. But six forces converging simultaneously in 2026 make the stakes categorically higher than any prior period:
▪ The Great Wealth Transfer
$84 trillion will be transferred globally by 2045. 2026 is the inflection year for the first major cohort of G1→G2 transitions. The governance networks built around founding principals must reconstitute — or they fragment. 70% do.
▪ AI Integration at Scale
Type 3 and Type 4 AI tools are entering family office investment operations faster than governance architecture can accommodate them. AI agents are participating as ungoverned actants — making recommendations, shaping information flows, bypassing investment committees — without authority frameworks, epistemic trust calibration, or accountability architecture. This is not a technology question. It is a governance network question.
▪ Regulatory Complexity Acceleration
Global regulatory frameworks for family offices are diverging across jurisdictions. The formal governance architecture required to keep pace is expanding beyond what most family offices have built. Compliance architecture is becoming governance architecture — and the two are not the same thing.
▪ Branch Complexity Growth
Multi-branch families are reaching second and third generations simultaneously. Governance structures designed for single-branch operation are breaking under the weight of diverging interests, competing succession timelines, and cross-branch coordination failures.
▪ Investment Complexity Escalation
Private markets, direct co-investment, real assets, and alternative structures now require a governance architecture that most family offices have not built. The gap between operational sophistication and governance architecture is widening — quietly generating the conditions for the pre-dissolution signals we measure.
▪ Talent Competition
CIO and governance professional talent is increasingly mobile. Family offices that depend on single individuals as network bridges face permanent structural vulnerability. Bridge actor departure doesn't just create a personnel gap — it removes a governance network position that often takes years to rebuild.
These six forces are not independent trends. They converge on the same point: the governance network. Family offices that can see their network — measure it, tend it, intervene before dysfunction reaches crisis — have a categorical advantage over those that cannot.
Our Mandate — What We Install and Why
BoardAlchemy™ installs Multi-Layer Ecosystem Governance infrastructure for family offices navigating the $84 trillion generational wealth transfer. We work across two integrated methodologies that address both the institutional system and the individuals who must operate within it.
Whom We Serve — Primary and Adjacent Environments
Primary — Family Office Ecosystem
▪ Single Family Offices (SFOs)
$100M–$10B+ AUM — the full governance network challenge: three coordination layers, generational transition, AI integration, GP relationship infrastructure.
▪ Multi-Family Offices (MFOs)
Multi-principal governance complexity — the coordination challenge is structural, not personal. Platform-level governance architecture for firms serving 10–100 client families.
▪ Family Principals & Governance Boards
G1 founders navigating authority transfer. G2/G3 next-generation leaders are building a governance network position. Independent directors require network intelligence to govern effectively.
▪ Chief Investment Officers
The most structurally vulnerable role in the family office ecosystem — bridge actor between family principal, investment team, and GP network. Retention requires network architecture, not just compensation.
Adjacent — PE/VC Portfolio Governance
The same governance network principles that determine family office outcomes apply at the apex of PE/VC portfolio systems. Troika Calibration™ for Chair–CEO–Investor alignment. Decision velocity under capital pressure. Leadership coherence through entry, integration, and exit inflection points. The framework transfers — the environment simply has different timelines and different stakeholder configurations.
Documented Outcomes — What Governance Architecture Produces
▪ 867× –13,333× ROI through governance maturity improvements
▪ 220 bps Annual performance uplift documented
▪ 75–85% Bypass incident reduction
Governance maturity improvements from 28→48 to 44→71 on a 100-point scale across Crisis Response, Systematic Build, and Generational Transition engagements at $400M–$1.5B family offices. Static capital leak reduction alone recovers $4.2M–$26.4M annually — multiples exceeding any investment strategy available, while preserving the family relationships that make multi-generational stewardship possible.
Mandate Stewardship
BoardAlchemy™ operates at the intersection of governance network science, relational infrastructure, and multi-generational wealth stewardship — serving single and multi-family offices navigating the governance challenges that determine whether wealth transfers intact across generations or fragments at the first point of structural pressure.
The firm was established to resolve a recurring failure mode observed consistently across the family office ecosystem: as complexity increases — through generational transition, investment sophistication, AI integration, and branch expansion — governance networks deteriorate. Not because principals and executives lack capability, but because no systematic infrastructure exists to make the governance network visible, measurable, and governable before dysfunction reaches crisis.
The pattern is structural, not personal. Family offices are three-layer actor-networks requiring systematic coordination across Family ↔ Executives, Executives ↔ General Partners, and the integrated ecosystem. The governance that appears functional on an org chart is frequently absent at the network level — where the actual decisions flow, the trust either holds or erodes, and the informal influence patterns determine outcomes that formal structures cannot reach.
70% of family offices lose wealth by the second generation. Not from investment underperformance — from governance dysfunction that erodes both capital and family unity. The network is the governance. If you cannot see it, you cannot govern it.
Mr Veselin Shivachev
Founder & Mandate Holder
Mr Shivachev founded BoardAlchemy™ to address the governance network failure mode that conventional advisory frameworks cannot reach — the structural deterioration that occurs at the relational and dynamic level of family office networks, invisible to formal governance reviews until the damage is done.
His work is conducted exclusively with family office principals, Chief Investment Officers, governance boards, and next-generation leaders navigating the governance challenges of multi-generational wealth stewardship — and selectively with PE/VC partners, portfolio CEOs, and board chairs operating at capital inflection points where governance network integrity is non-negotiable.
His methodology integrates the mechanics of corporate governance, the rigour of organisational psychology, and the precision of applied behavioural dynamics & network science to ensure leadership systems remain resilient as they scale.
Mandate stewardship is time-bound, selective, and board-level. Engagements are initiated where the governance network evidence — structural, relational, and trajectory — indicates that intervention before crisis is both possible and consequential.
bottom of page